The Lahore High Court has issued a significant ruling clarifying legal principles related to khula and dower (haq mehr), setting aside errors made by lower courts in a case involving petitioner Azka Afeen.
The judgment addresses key questions regarding the entitlement and repayment of dower in cases of separation, and is expected to influence how family courts interpret similar disputes across Pakistan.
In a detailed 9-page written decision issued by Justice Mirza Waqar Rauf, the court held that a woman remains entitled to her dower even if the marriage is not consummated or the spouses have not lived together. The court further clarified that non-consummation of marriage does not extinguish the right to dower.
The case involved a dispute over khula and the recovery of dower, where the court examined the terms outlined in the nikahnama (marriage contract) and relevant provisions of family law.
Dower payment clarified under nikahnama terms
The court observed that if the time of payment is not specified in the nikahnama, the full dower becomes immediately payable. It added that where the details of dower are clearly stated—such as gold, property, or other assets—it will be treated as payable on demand unless otherwise agreed.
The judgment also stated that unclear payment terms cannot be interpreted as deferred payment under law, reinforcing that the full amount remains legally enforceable.
Khula and partial dower return principle
In its ruling, the court noted that in cases where a woman seeks dissolution of marriage through khula, she may be required to return 25% of the dower to the husband as part of the legal process for immediate dissolution.
The Lahore High Court allowed Azka Afeen’s petition, correcting the findings of lower courts and providing clearer legal guidance on the application of dower and khula-related provisions.
Also Read’Balochistan launches Rs1.58 billion school meal programme
Today's E-Paper