The refusal by Punjab and Sindh to accept imported wheat is less about grain quality and more about the incomplete transition from a state‑dominated procurement system to a liberalised wheat market. Pakistan’s two largest wheat‑consuming provinces prefer to draw on existing federal stocks rather than accept imported grain, which they argue is of lower quality. Yet these imports are themselves the product of policy changes that scaled back state procurement without establishing a credible replacement mechanism to maintain strategic reserves and manage supply. With the government’s role reduced, the shortfall in domestic output has forced reliance on imports. The supply gap has already driven flour prices up by 77 percent in a year, and the proposed imports are aimed at calming market sentiment.
There is a valid case for reducing the government’s traditional role in the wheat market. Routine procurement, stockholding, and price interventions distort market signals and place heavy burdens on public finances. A competitive private market should, in theory, allocate wheat more efficiently. However, withdrawing the state from procurement does not absolve it of responsibility. The failure lies in the absence of a credible mechanism to replace the functions once performed by government procurement.
When the state buys less at harvest, farmers are left vulnerable to price collapses, while consumers later face shortages and excessive price increases. These functions cannot be left entirely to traders, who enjoy greater access to finance, storage facilities, market information, and political influence than farmers. The reduction in provincial procurement has weakened farmers’ bargaining power, allowing traders to gain greater control over stocks and their release. Farmers have suffered when prices fell, while consumers have simultaneously faced higher flour costs.
This situation does not justify a return to the old procurement regime, which was costly and inefficient. But liberalisation cannot succeed without a credible replacement mechanism that ensures farmers receive fair returns and remain incentivised to produce sufficient wheat for a growing population. Without such safeguards, the risks of volatility in both farm incomes and consumer prices will persist.
The challenge now is to design a system that balances efficiency with protection. Farmers must be shielded from sudden price collapses, while consumers must be protected from shortages and inflationary spikes. Strategic reserves, transparent market information, and regulatory oversight can provide this balance. The state’s role should evolve from direct procurement to ensuring that markets function fairly and that vulnerable groups are not exploited.
Pakistan’s wheat market is at a crossroads. The refusal of provinces to accept imported grain highlights the deeper structural issues that remain unresolved. Unless policymakers establish a credible framework to replace the functions once performed by government procurement, both farmers and consumers will continue to suffer. The promise of liberalisation will remain unfulfilled until the system guarantees stability, fairness, and sustainability for all stakeholders.
Also Read: From stability to growth
Today's E-Paper