The strength of a state is determined not merely by the abundance of its natural resources, but by the equitable distribution of those resources, effective governance, and the timely delivery of essential public services. When a region remains deprived of the benefits of development for decades, its people have little voice in administrative decision making, and living standards fail to improve despite abundant natural wealth, serious consideration of administrative reforms becomes both necessary and justified.
The districts of Upper Kohistan, Lower Kohistan, Kolai-Palas, Shangla, Alai, Battagram, and Torghar in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa represent such a region. Blessed with rich mineral reserves, dense forests, abundant water resources, and significant tourism potential, these districts continue to face persistent challenges in education, healthcare, employment, road infrastructure, and other essential public services. It is difficult to dispute that the pace of development in these areas has fallen well short of their immense potential.
These districts are not only geographically connected but also share common cultural traditions, social values, historical ties, and development priorities. These shared characteristics provide a strong basis for considering a more effective administrative framework designed to address their unique challenges and accelerate their socio-economic progress.
The concept of the Province of Abaseen is not rooted in ethnic or regional division. Rather, it is a constitutional and democratic proposal aimed at improving governance, enhancing administrative efficiency, ensuring a fair distribution of public resources, and bringing historically neglected areas into the national mainstream of development. Around the world, similar administrative reforms have been debated and implemented to improve public service delivery and governmental effectiveness. This proposal, therefore, deserves to be evaluated on the basis of facts, empirical evidence, and the broader public interest rather than political sentiment or emotional rhetoric.
The discussion should not be confined solely to the creation of a new administrative unit. It must also address a more fundamental question: why has a region endowed with such significant natural resources continued to lag behind on key development indicators? If the existing administrative structure has been unable to meet the legitimate expectations of its people, then examining alternative governance models is a natural and democratic course of action.
The time has come for the government, elected representatives, policy experts, civil society, and the people of the region to engage in a meaningful and constructive dialogue. The objective is not to diminish the rights of any other region but to ensure that every citizen enjoys an equal share of development opportunities, public resources, and state attention.
If administrative reforms can genuinely improve the lives of the people of Upper Kohistan, Lower Kohistan, Kolai-Palas, Shangla, Alai, Battagram, and Torghar, then the idea of the Province of Abaseen should not be viewed merely as a political demand. It should be recognized as a legitimate subject for national policy debate. Such matters should be decided not through emotion or political expediency, but in accordance with the Constitution, the rule of law, the public interest, and the principles of good governance. Only through such an approach can Pakistan build a stronger, more balanced, and more prosperous federation.
Also Read: A Habit of Second Thought
Today's E-Paper