The United States appears to have no clear exit strategy from its disastrous war with Iran. President Donald Trump has oscillated between issuing bombastic threats and claiming that peace is within reach, often reversing his stance within hours. Such erratic behaviour is not the hallmark of responsible statecraft. At one point, he threatened to destroy Iranian civilisation, while more recently he warned of unleashing “Military Terror … not seen since World War II.” His latest pronouncement offered Iran a “last chance” to choose between a deal or “total surrender.” Yet, after five months of war, Iran has largely remained unfazed by these threats.
The chaos in Washington is hardly surprising. Mr Trump plunged headlong into the conflict on February 28 at Israel’s urging, without adequate preparation or reflection. Had he studied the mistakes of his predecessors in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya, he might have avoided repeating them. But introspection has never been his strength. Reports — though officially denied — suggest that the US is running low on key munitions, while senior generals have warned that viable military options are dwindling. One account even claimed that Centcom solicited “creative and unconventional ways to punish Iran” via email from defence experts, a clear indication of policy confusion. Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia has reportedly urged Washington to give diplomacy another chance, recognising that renewed hostilities would engulf the region in immense destruction.
It is never easy for leaders to admit they are wrong, but Mr Trump must acknowledge that Operation ‘Epic Fury’ has been an epic failure. None of America’s objectives have been achieved. Iran retains its nuclear capabilities, continues to support regional allies, and has strengthened its control over the Strait of Hormuz since the war began. The dream of regime change has backfired spectacularly: the pragmatic old guard eliminated by US and Israeli strikes has been replaced by a harder, more ideologically driven leadership.
From this point forward, the United States must abandon violent rhetoric and approach Iran with respect. Pakistan, identified by Tehran as a key mediator, can continue pressing for the revival of the Islamabad MoU. If Washington persists with threats, it will only sink deeper into the quagmire, as Iran’s hard‑line establishment appears determined to resist.
The war has already exposed the futility of coercion and the dangers of reckless policy. What is needed now is a sober reassessment of goals and a willingness to engage in genuine diplomacy. Without such a shift, the conflict will drag on, exacting a heavy toll on the region and further eroding America’s credibility.
Today's E-Paper