The crisis in Venezuela has entered a volatile phase following reports of a January 2026 U.S. military operation, sharpening global focus on a country already strained by years of economic collapse, political confrontation, and regional disputes. While accounts of the operation itself differ, the episode has brought renewed scrutiny to the deeper forces that have shaped Venezuela’s decline — from oil dependence and sanctions to mass migration, criminal economies and unresolved territorial tensions.4
What is known — and what remains disputed — about January 2026
On January 3, 2026, U.S. forces carried out coordinated early-morning strikes on multiple sites in northern Venezuela, according to official statements and international reporting. Washington acknowledged military action, framing it as part of broader security and enforcement objectives.
However, claims that Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores were seized and transferred to the United States remain contested among governments and legal experts. This distinction is critical: while strikes are confirmed, the legal status of any extraterritorial detention would carry profound implications for international law, sovereignty and precedent.
For this reason, credible coverage continues to distinguish between confirmed military action and disputed custody claims.
Oil wealth without power
At the heart of Venezuela’s crisis lies a paradox. The country holds the largest proven oil reserves in the world, yet its ability to produce and export oil has collapsed.
Years of mismanagement, underinvestment and corruption weakened the sector long before sanctions took hold. Aging infrastructure in the Orinoco Belt, frequent power outages, and the emigration of skilled workers further reduced capacity. Even during periods of high global oil prices, Venezuela lacked the financing, technology and operational stability needed to benefit.
This erosion left vast reserves effectively stranded, turning oil — once the backbone of the state — into a symbol of lost leverage.
Sanctions and economic isolation
U.S. and allied sanctions targeted Venezuela’s state oil company PDVSA, government finances and senior officials, sharply limiting access to global markets and capital.
Limited waivers, including narrow licences granted to companies such as Chevron, allowed modest production and maintenance activity but did not reverse systemic decline. Supporters of sanctions argue they were necessary to pressure an increasingly authoritarian system. Critics counter that they deepened humanitarian suffering while accelerating informal and illicit economic activity.
Both effects now shape Venezuela’s economic reality.
Energy geopolitics: from Caracas to Georgetown
As Venezuela’s oil sector deteriorated, regional energy power shifted. ExxonMobil pivoted away from Venezuela toward neighbouring Guyana, where massive offshore discoveries transformed the country into one of the world’s fastest-growing oil producers.
The contrast was stark: Guyana’s production surged as Venezuela’s collapsed. Caracas has accused international companies of lobbying against it and entrenching Guyana’s rise, while Georgetown maintains its development is lawful and internationally recognised. The result has been a profound rebalancing of regional energy influence.
The Essequibo dispute: territory, oil and pressure politics
Venezuela’s long-standing claim over Guyana’s Essequibo region gained renewed prominence alongside Guyana’s oil boom. The dispute became a domestic political lever, with nationalist rhetoric used to rally support amid economic hardship.
At the same time, international legal proceedings and external security assurances to Guyana raised the cost of escalation. Analysts generally view the dispute as a pressure tool rather than a prelude to war, but acknowledge that miscalculation remains a risk in a region newly defined by offshore energy assets.
Economic collapse and a humanitarian emergency
Inside Venezuela, economic failure translated into daily hardship. Hyperinflation destroyed savings, shortages of food and medicine became chronic, and public services deteriorated. Hospitals struggled to function, schools lost staff, and basic utilities became unreliable.
As state capacity shrank, survival increasingly depended on informal dollarisation, remittances from abroad and parallel markets. These coping mechanisms kept many afloat but also underscored the depth of institutional breakdown.
Migration and regional spillovers
The crisis drove millions of Venezuelans to leave the country, creating one of the largest displacement flows in the Americas. Neighbouring states faced pressure on health systems, education networks and labour markets.
Regional responses oscillated between humanitarian protection and tighter border controls. Alongside legitimate movement, smuggling and trafficking networks exploited porous routes, adding a security dimension to what began as a humanitarian emergency.
Criminal economies and state erosion
As formal economic structures weakened, illicit activity expanded. U.S. indictments and intelligence assessments have accused senior figures of ties to narcotics trafficking — allegations the Venezuelan government rejects. The narrative of state-linked criminal networks has remained central to sanctions and prosecutions.
Illegal gold mining in the Orinoco and Amazonian regions emerged as another revenue source, but at immense environmental and social cost, including deforestation, mercury contamination and displacement of indigenous communities. Sanctions evasion through opaque financial channels further blurred the line between state authority and organised crime.
External alliances — and their limits
To offset isolation, Venezuela relied on external partners. Russia provided security cooperation and energy assistance; China extended loans and infrastructure investment; Iran supplied fuel and industrial support; and Cuba offered security and governance expertise.
Over time, sanctions, market shifts and Venezuela’s own institutional decay reduced the effectiveness of these alliances. Political solidarity persisted, but material support became harder to sustain.
Opposition, elections and legitimacy
Political legitimacy eroded through contested elections and sustained repression of opposition movements. The 2018 and 2024 votes drew widespread international criticism, deepening Venezuela’s diplomatic isolation and intensifying external pressure.
Opposition fragmentation, exile and internal divisions further complicated prospects for political change, even as public discontent grew.
Media control and information battles
State media and allied outlets shaped official narratives, while independent journalists and activists faced censorship, intimidation and surveillance. At the same time, diaspora networks and international platforms became key channels for counter-messaging, turning information itself into a battleground.
Law, diplomacy and uncertain futures
The reported January 2026 U.S. operation brought unresolved legal questions into sharp relief. Any unilateral military intervention raises concerns over sovereignty, jurisdiction and due process. Multilateral forums remain divided on sanctions relief, humanitarian access and accountability mechanisms.
Looking ahead, analysts outline three broad scenarios: a negotiated transition leading to market reintegration; prolonged stagnation under continued sanctions; or a hybrid path of limited recovery through selective waivers and technical partnerships. Each carries significant risks for Venezuela and the wider region.
Bottom line
The Venezuela crisis is not defined by a single event. It is the product of converging forces — oil dependence without capacity, sanctions and isolation, regional energy shifts, territorial disputes, humanitarian collapse, migration and criminal economies. The disputed U.S. operation of January 2026 sits atop these long-running pressures, sharpening global attention but not resolving the underlying causes.
As Venezuela stands at another uncertain crossroads, the consequences of its prolonged crisis continue to shape energy markets, migration patterns and security calculations across the Americas.
Also read: Nicolás Maduro, Venezuela’s president: from bus driver to U.S. custody
Today's E-Paper