The Indian media once again made a concerted effort to link the Indian terrorist in Sydney with Pakistan. This was a well-thought-out plan that was the brainchild of Modi and Netanyahu. From Delhi to Jerusalem and from Kabul to Doha, the propaganda was rehearsed that the terrorist attackers on Bondi Beach in Sydney were Pakistanis.
Modi and Netanyahu tried to achieve success in two ways: they tried to link the attackers to Pakistan, but they failed miserably. However, Modi succeeded in this plan by saying that India, where minorities are under attack, especially the Muslim minority, is Modi’s target. Now, an attempt will be made to completely crush the Muslims of India under the guise of this incident.
India’s past efforts to label Pakistan a terrorist state
When we turn the pages of the past, we have to realize that after the self-imposed blasts in Mumbai on March 12, 1993, India has been consistently determined to prove us a terrorist state. On the Mumbai bomb blasts, former Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had lamented that “Pakistan is a nursery of terrorism.” Even then, many anti-Pakistan analysts were calling Manmohan’s acceptance of India’s self-imposed and weak position at the UN forum a victory for India.
While our then Prime Minister was expanding relations with India, he could not realize that an enemy like Modi would never give up his nature. On September 28, 1993, at the UN forum, Manmohan Singh beautifully dressed his words in the guise of lies. The fact that he was not able to defend his position better in the Security Council even before that can certainly be interpreted as our failure.
Pakistan’s regional security role ignored
In Asia, Pakistan can be called a security zone for neighboring countries, which has been a mirror of peace and security of its neighbors since its independence. In the past, former Indian Foreign Minister E. Ahmed tried to make Pakistan the target of the topic of “threats to international security” in New York through his speech and words. Later, the way Manmohan maintained that continuity was certainly a cause of concern and a lesson for those Pakistani circles who are fighting the cause of the beloved homeland at various forums in the outside world.
Then, the Indian Deputy Foreign Minister, like today’s Indian Prime Minister, implemented his evil plan thanks to the acceptance of his position and Pakistani Ambassador to the United Nations Hussain Haroon was unable to defend him and convince him of his position.
Mumbai blasts and fabricated terror links
In the Mumbai bomb blasts, an unsuccessful attempt was made to shed the blood of 200 human lives and blame all the damage on Pakistan. This was a drama whose rehearsal was jointly masterminded by the Pakistan-hostile agencies “RAW and Mossad”. A person named Ajmal Kasab was created and his connection to Pakistan was linked. In these self-imposed explosions, a fake name, Abu Ismail, a young man from Dera Ismail Khan, was used. Like Ajmal Kasab, no person of this name was registered in the NADRA records in Dera Ismail Khan division.
Terrorism narrative versus Kashmir freedom struggle
After the self-inflicted incident of 9/11, the Muslim world is still in a state of war. Today, we have to convince various forums around the world that there is a clear difference between terrorism and the war for the right to self-determination being fought in Kashmir. We have to clarify this difference. We have to awaken the global conscience through our stance on the preciousness of human blood and Muslim blood. If those fighting the war of freedom are terrorists, then in which row will the freedom hero Bhagat Singh be counted? What will be the definition of Mangal Pandey’s struggle for freedom?
Muslims blamed in 1993 Mumbai blasts
If we look into the background of the 1993 Mumbai bomb blasts, it is clear that this was a self-inflicted incident to label Muslims as terrorists. The blame for this blast was placed on 120 Muslims and Dawood Ibrahim’s name was used as the mastermind to link them to Pakistan. At that time, it was proven that the blasts were carried out by Chhota Rajan, a Hindu associated with the Shiv Sena, so that the influence of Muslims could be eliminated from Mumbai by blaming them for these blasts.
For the information of the readers, it is requested that at that time Mumbai was completely under the control of Muslims in terms of business and other influences. No one accepted the responsibility for the 1993 Mumbai bomb blasts, but Muslims were arrested and then 37 Muslims were imprisoned in Arthro Jail in Mumbai without any trial. In February 2024, it was proven that Muslims had no hand in these blasts.
Yakub Memon’s courtroom statement
On September 12, 2006, when Judge PD Kode of India’s infamous TADA court was pronouncing the verdict in the 1993 bomb blasts, Yakub Memon, a Muslim arrested in connection with the blasts, stood in the courtroom and uttered these words: “All this drama is going on. Innocent people are being punished. In India, we are being branded as terrorists. We don’t need any lawyers. We have been seeing for the past several years how innocent Muslims are being labelled as terrorists.”
India’s narrative repeated at global forums
When we look back, Manmohan Singh, like the 1993 Mumbai bomb blasts, had also spewed venom on the platform of the G8 conference and tried his best to prove his position. However, the weakness of our government at that time was revealed and the cause of our beloved country could not be fought with a strong stance.
Samjhauta Express tragedy and denied investigation
In March 2007, several coaches of the Samjhauta Express, which ran between Lahore and Delhi, were blown up by bombs at the Dewana railway station near Panipat, a hundred kilometers from New Delhi, resulting in the deaths of 67 Pakistanis. The prominent Indian newspaper, The Times of India, described it as an act of Hindu extremists. The Home Minister of Haryana and the IG Police also said that anti-Pakistan extremist Hindus were involved in this act, who used a mixture of kerosene, sulfur, and potassium nitrate and hid these incendiary bombs inside the train.
However, instead of arresting the real terrorists of the incident, three Muslims were arrested and, sadly, three Pakistani passengers were also tortured in the name of investigation. The joint investigation into the 1993 Mumbai bomb blasts was rejected, and when Pakistan insisted on a joint investigation into the Samjhauta Express tragedy, not only was the joint investigation refused, but the Pakistani team was not even allowed to inspect the accident site.
Malegaon blasts and selective justice
In Malegaon, Maharashtra, when Hindu extremists killed 49 Muslims and injured 257 in bomb blasts, the arrests were made of Muslims and India’s secularism was exposed in such a way that the families of Hindu heirs who died in the 1993 Mumbai bomb blasts were given Rs 50,000 each, while the families of Muslim martyrs in Malegaon were merely announced to give Rs 50,000 each, which has not been given till date.
On April 6, 2006, SP Rajyavardhan raided the house of Ram Lal, a terrorist of Bajrang Dal, and recovered explosives, fake beards and burqas worn by Muslim women. In the Malegaon bomb blasts, the body of a man who had grown a fake beard was also found. A Muslim named Muhammad Aqeel said that when he picked up the body, the beard fell off and fell on the ground, which he showed to the police on the spot.
Anti-Muslim riots after independence
Today, Modi’s tongue is spewing venom against the Muslim state, but he has forgotten that the continuation of anti-Muslim riots in India was started by Hindus as soon as independence was achieved. To prevent this, Pakistan’s first Prime Minister Liaquat Ali Khan visited India, where, under the “Liaquat Nehru Pact” with the then Indian Prime Minister Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru, the principles and regulations for the protection of minorities in India and Pakistan were agreed upon.
Both governments were declared responsible for the protection of the rights and caste of minorities. After this Liaquat Nehru Pact, the ink of this pact had not yet dried in India when anti-Muslim riots began in West Bengal in which 311 Muslims were martyred, 50 Muslims were martyred and hundreds were injured in the city of Jabalpur in Madhya Pradesh, and riots broke out in the cities of Patna and Gaya in Bihar in which 150 Muslims were martyred.
Rising toll of violence against Muslims in India
In 1957, 200 Muslims were martyred in Aligarh and Meerut and 1000 in 1962. These figures are released by the Indian government. The actual testimonies and losses are much higher. According to Communist Party MP Mohammad Ishaq Sambhali, 7500 anti-Muslim riots took place after the “Nehru-Liaquat Pact”. According to a report by Muslim India, the central government has closed 646 mosques for worshippers.
The head of the United Nations Human Rights Commission, Navya Pillay, said during a press conference at the UN headquarters in New York that “there is deep concern about the extrajudicial killings, torture and arrests of hundreds of people in occupied Kashmir and such actions are clear violations of human rights.”
Australia investigation exposes propaganda
India has always had a habit of resorting to propaganda to cover up its failures and terrorist acts. Modi tried his best to cover up the terrorist attack on Bondi Beach in Sydney, in which Australia investigated and exposed the truth. A Muslim Ahmed provided proof of humanity by risking his life to prevent further loss of lives, who was formally declared a hero by the Australian Prime Minister.
Internal unrest and separatist movements in India
But the separatists occupying 92,000 square miles of its 160 districts forgot the forces that are waging a secession movement in the provinces of Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh, Odisha, Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh, West Bengal, Assam, and Bihar, fed up with government atrocities. In these districts, 11,000 people were killed in five years and these were people who were members of separatist movements.
The background of Modi’s bigoted attitude needs to be explored. Its roots can be traced back to the period when Muslim leaders involved in the common struggle for freedom, sensing Hindu mentality and narrow-mindedness, began the struggle to obtain a separate homeland for the Muslims of the subcontinent.
Historical hostility and present-day narrative
India started the atrocities against Pakistan when this state came into existence. Where India, together with Mountbatten, tried to weaken Pakistan by incorporating the areas that were to be included in Pakistan into India, it also stopped the capital and weapons coming to Pakistan. It did not stop there, but after the establishment of Pakistan, it occupied Kashmir and imposed war.
Now, under the guise of the terrorist incident in Australia, a narrative will be fabricated to restrict the land of Muslims in India and declare them terrorists. However, a failed wish remained that Modi and Netanyahu’s plan to make Pakistan a terrorist country has come to naught.
One of the background of this attack in Australia is that Australia had insisted on recognizing Palestine as an independent state, which was unacceptable to Israel. The current government in Pakistan should know that we have to stop a game in Asia in which India is constantly throwing its cards for its supremacy, and this is possible only when we will be at the forefront in international forums thanks to our powerful position.
Read more expert opinions here: https://thepublicpurview.com/blog/
For more stories and insights, visit The Green Post
