The Mecca Joint Defence Agreement provides a glimpse of a possible new security arrangement in a region long marked by conflict, mistrust and competing alliances. The Mecca Agreement on 7 August between Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Turkeys states that an armed attack against one member will be considered an attack against all three. This is more than a defence understanding for Pakistan. It may signify a pivotal moment in the national effort to renew its role in the region in a turbulent world.
The importance of the agreement lies in the strengths that the three countries bring together. Pakistan has an experienced military, strategic location, and nuclear deterrence. Turkey has a powerful military and an increasingly advanced defence industry. Saudi Arabia has vast financial power, strategic influence, and influence in the Arab and Muslim worlds. These, when woven together, could provide a viable option to collective security and deterrence.
But for Pakistan the true significance of the deal should extend beyond military symbolism. Islamabad should leverage its strategic relationship with Turkey and Saudi Arabia to obtain technology transfer, joint defence production, intelligence cooperation, military training and investment. Partnering with others would be a serious strategic burden for Pakistan if it does not boost its economic strength and technological potential. Technological progress, employment, defence exports, and increased self-reliance should be the true signs of success of such cooperation.
The agreement could also help to foster the strategic autonomy of the Muslim world. Muslim countries have been relying on outside powers for weapons, military technology, intelligence and security guarantees for decades. In this regard, Pakistan, Turkey and Saudi Arabia have an opportunity to minimize this dependency by investing in their own capacities. A stronger and more independent security structure could gradually develop through joint research, defence production and sharing of technology.
A credible collective defence pledging can bolster deterrence. The potential aggressor would have to take into account the likely response of three strategically important states instead of one. Sometimes conflict can be prevented by making it too costly through strong deterrence. From this perspective, the Mecca pact may help to bring peace by reducing the attractiveness of war.
Yet Pakistan must not allow enthusiasm to hide the risks.
The deal has come at a time when West Asia is highly polarised. Ongoing tensions between Iran and other regional powers with the United States have led every new security pact to be scrutinized for its political implications. While Pakistan has put emphasis on the fact that the pact is defensive and not against any specific country, perceptions count in international politics. Islamabad needs to ensure that collective defence does not slowly transform into collective confrontation.
This is particularly significant as the foreign policy of Pakistan must involve keeping relationship with competing powers. The relationship with Saudi Arabia and Turkey must not be perceived as a zero-sum game with the relationship with Iran and China or limit Pakistan’s diplomatic options with the United States. In the past, Pakistan has been able to overcome the tough politics in the region by balancing the affairs skillfully. The new security is going to put to the test its capacity to keep that balance.
Pakistan also should not be a country of strategic overstretch. The nation is already grappling with internal security problems and suffering economic pressures. The expansion of regional duties may lead to more military and economic commitments. Defence cooperation should boost Pakistan’s national security, not strain the country’s resources.
But the real test will be implementation. Headlines are made with political declarations, but institutions decide if agreements live. Consultation, intelligence-sharing, joint military exercises, and operational coordination are essential between the three countries. They will also need to set out procedures for defining aggression and the authorisation of a collective response.
Hence it’s too soon to call this a “Muslim NATO”. NATO is the result of decades of institutional development, integrated planning and established command structures. The Mecca framework is still at its infancy. Its credibility will not be determined by the signing ceremony, but by the institutions and capabilities created afterwards.
Caution should be used in expanding, too. More countries would not mean more political influence for the alliance, but more membership does. States have varying levels of interest, priorities, and threat perception. Therefore, any expansion should be gradual and based on real strategic convergence and not political symbolism.
However, Pakistan can benefit from the agreement if it is done with clarity and purpose. The agreement can help build its regional profile and provide opportunities for investment and defence technology. Cooperation in other new technologies such as drones, aerospace, cyber-security can be developed in Pakistan. Pakistan has human resources and its existing defence capability, which can be supported by Saudi investment and Turkish technological know-how.
But strategic ambition must remain tied to the national interest at all times. Commitments should not be taken in Pakistan because of their visibility in international arena. Each new duty has to be assessed based on the country’s economic capability, security policies and foreign policy goals. An economy short of cash can’t afford unlimited military commitment.
The terms of the agreement should also give the opportunity to Pakistan to beef up its diplomacy. Islamabad can pursue its efforts to strengthen security cooperation without abandoning the principles of dialogue and de-escalation. Geographically, Pakistan is a pivotal country between South Asia, the Gulf, the central Asian region, and the broader Muslim world. It should use this role to forge bridges not to widen divisions.
The guiding principle must remain simple: collective defence should never become collective confrontation.
Finally, it is essential that the Mecca pact be evaluated based on performance and not promises. It could be an important mechanism for regional security if it leads to intelligence sharing, joint exercises, defence production, technology transfer and better diplomatic cooperation. If it’s just a declaration, it won’t have much of a impact.
The deal is a chance and challenge for Pakistan. It has a higher strategic value but a higher diplomatic cost. It can enhance deterrence but Pakistan must ensure that it is not involved in conflicts that harms the national interest.
A more pluralist and competitive international regime is taking shape in the world. Rather, Pakistan must not be a silent spectator of these changes. It must have dependable allies, enhanced indigenous skills and a foreign policy that cuts through conflicting interests without getting bogged down in them.
The Mecca pact can add to Pakistan’s strategic heft. However, strategic weight is only useful if the strategy is used correctly. The real success of this agreement will not be if three countries promise to fight side by side. If it will succeed in making them united in the cause of peace, deterrence, technological development and regional stability then it will be a real success.
The biggest achievement of the Mecca pact would be to avoid preparing the region for another war, in a time when it is desperately looking for stability.
Also Read: 75 years of Pak China Everlasting Friendship
Today's E-Paper