Jura Energy Corporation is facing escalating legal and regulatory pressure after a minority shareholder launched oppression proceedings in Ontario, alleging governance failures that could threaten the company’s petroleum licences in Pakistan. The case, filed before the Ontario Superior Court’s Commercial List, names the company and directors Mehran Inayat Mirza, Kashif Naseem Afzal and Stephen Christopher Smith.
The lawsuit claims Jura’s board allowed a transfer of effective corporate control without securing approvals required under Pakistani petroleum law, potentially putting at risk the concessions that underpin its entire business. The dispute adds to ongoing scrutiny of the Canadian-listed company’s operations overseas, where regulators have examined compliance issues involving its subsidiaries.
Allegations focus on governance and licence risks
According to the court filing, Jura’s business depends on petroleum concessions held in Pakistan through Frontier Holdings Limited and Spud Energy Pty Ltd. The shareholder alleges directors proceeded with a change in control despite knowing regulatory approval was mandatory, exposing the licences to possible enforcement action.
The claimant is seeking several remedies, including a declaration that the directors’ conduct was oppressive and unfairly prejudicial, an independent investigation, forensic accounting, and damages. The application also asks the court to compel disclosure of corporate records and consider punitive damages against individual directors.
If granted, such orders could subject the company’s governance and financial conduct to court-supervised review.
Earlier regulatory scrutiny in Pakistan
The shareholder action follows years of regulatory attention in Pakistan related to Jura’s subsidiaries. Regulatory records and whistleblower complaints referenced in proceedings have alleged unauthorized gas sales between related entities and disputes over royalty payments.
Authorities, including Pakistan’s Directorate General of Petroleum Concessions (DGPC), issued show-cause notices examining compliance with concession agreements and petroleum rules. According to regulatory proceedings, officials reviewed whether corporate actions were carried out in accordance with applicable approvals and licensing conditions.
The matters also drew attention from senior government offices, and officials sought recovery of unpaid royalty amounts in earlier disputes, according to records referenced in the legal filings.
Parallel legal and regulatory developments
Legal proceedings in Pakistan have also addressed questions surrounding corporate control and licensing compliance. Courts have directed regulators to proceed under petroleum laws where necessary, increasing pressure on Jura’s subsidiaries.
Industry analysts note that Jura’s operating assets are concentrated in Pakistan, making the company highly dependent on maintaining government-issued concessions. Any adverse regulatory findings could affect its ability to continue producing or selling petroleum resources.
The Ontario lawsuit now places Jura’s leadership under judicial scrutiny in Canada while regulatory and legal processes continue in Pakistan. The outcome of these proceedings could influence both the company’s governance structure and the status of its core operating licences.
Today's E-Paper