By Omay Aimen
The world’s attention has once again turned to Gaza, where the devastation of war has left millions at the brink of survival. Amid global paralysis, Pakistan’s possible participation in an International Stabilisation Force (ISF) has ignited a debate not about humanitarian need, but about political misrepresentation. Propagandists, both domestic and foreign, have flooded digital spaces with fabricated claims that Pakistan would be deployed to disarm Hamas or act as a proxy for Western or Israeli interests.
This is a deliberate distortion of Pakistan’s intent and its peacekeeping legacy. What is unfolding is not a debate over foreign policy but a battle between facts and propaganda, between Pakistan’s proven humanitarian role and the toxic narratives crafted to discredit it. The truth, however, stands unshaken: Pakistan’s potential role in Gaza is not about politics, it is about principles.
Disarming Hamas: A Fabricated Claim
Those spreading the claim that Pakistani troops would be sent to Gaza to “disarm Hamas” are either profoundly uninformed or intentionally misleading. There exists no international, regional, or multilateral proposal not from the UN, the OIC, or the Arab League that mandates such a mission. Pakistan has never in its peacekeeping history participated in any operation aimed at disarming a resistance movement. From Bosnia to Congo, from Sierra Leone to Somalia, Pakistani troops have stood for peace, not political enforcement.
If Pakistan joins an ISF, its mission will be clear and humane: ensuring aid delivery, civilian safety, de-mining, and infrastructure rebuilding in Gaza. International charters strictly prohibit peacekeeping missions from taking sides in internal conflicts, and Pakistan has always upheld this principle with discipline and distinction. The attempt to portray this as a combat operation is a distortion designed to stir public emotion and sow confusion among the masses.
False Allegations of Supporting Israeli Operations
Another recurring falsehood claims that Pakistani forces, if deployed, would “facilitate Israeli operations.” Nothing could be further from the truth. Pakistan’s foreign policy and military doctrine are rooted in neutrality under international command structures, and the country has no diplomatic, military, or intelligence ties with Israel. The participation of Pakistan along with other Muslim-majority nations would, in fact, prevent any such mission from being dominated by Western or pro-Israel influence.
On the contrary, Pakistan’s inclusion would act as a check against Israeli excesses and ensure that Palestinian civilians receive genuine protection under UN supervision. Those familiar with Pakistan’s peacekeeping record understand that the country’s blue helmets are symbols of trust and neutrality, not instruments of foreign powers. Ironically, the very presence of Pakistani troops in such a mission would strengthen international scrutiny on Israel, not weaken it.
Diplomatic Recognition vs Humanitarian Mandate
Equally hollow is the claim that joining a UN or OIC-led stabilisation mission would amount to “recognising Israel,” an argument that willfully ignores history and law. Participation under an international humanitarian mandate does not constitute diplomatic recognition. Pakistan’s commitment to the Palestinian cause has remained unwavering since Quaid-e-Azam’s era. The founder’s vision was unequivocal to stand with the oppressed and to support the right to self-determination.
Assisting Gaza’s civilians in rebuilding their shattered lives would be an act in full alignment with that vision, not a betrayal of it. Pakistan has previously taken part in international missions in areas where it did not recognise certain authorities including Kosovo, South Sudan, and Somalia without any change in diplomatic status. To imply otherwise is to deliberately misinform and manipulate national sentiment for political convenience.
Undermining Pakistan’s Global Credibility
The real purpose behind this propaganda campaign is neither patriotism nor principle. It is part of a broader attempt to undermine Pakistan’s credibility on the global stage and weaken its voice in the Muslim world. The groups opposing Pakistan’s possible participation in the Gaza mission ranging from domestic political propagandists to external amplifiers are using fear tactics to create domestic polarisation and to sabotage Pakistan’s leadership role in humanitarian diplomacy.
Their narrative directly aids adversarial agendas that wish to see Pakistan isolated and discredited in international forums. The reality is simple. Pakistan will never act against the Palestinian cause. Any deployment, if decided, will be approved by Parliament, undertaken under international humanitarian objectives, and carried out under sovereign command.
Pakistan’s Peacekeeping Legacy
Pakistan’s record as one of the world’s largest and most respected contributors to UN peacekeeping missions speaks for itself. Its soldiers have stood in some of the most volatile regions of the world, earning the reputation of being disciplined, neutral, and courageous guardians of peace. Their presence in Gaza would not be a political endorsement; it would be a moral commitment to humanity. The effort to malign this intent reveals more about the propagandists than about Pakistan’s policy. They fear Pakistan’s re-emergence as a credible voice for the Muslim world, capable of bridging moral leadership with strategic responsibility.
A Clear Message of Humanitarian Principle
In essence, Pakistan’s message is clear: it will not go to Gaza to disarm resistance, but to defend humanity. It will not serve Israeli interests, but stand with the Palestinians. It will not compromise its sovereignty, but rather assert its global responsibility. The world may be divided in politics, but in the theatre of humanitarian conscience, Pakistan has always chosen the right side. Pakistan’s willingness to help Gaza is not a policy gamble, it is a reaffirmation of Quaid-e-Azam’s vision: that this country will always stand by the oppressed, no matter how fierce the propaganda or how loud the lies.
Read more expert opinions on diverse topics here: https://thepublicpurview.com/category/blog/
For climate-related stories, visit: The Green Post
