Judge Jamal Khan Mandokhail stressed on Tuesday that the suspect cannot be tested under the Army Act until the accusation is framed against them. Judge SC made these notes during hearing on intra-conceive appeal against a court with civilians in military courts, on Tuesday’s peak of the constitutional bench. The seven -member bench was led by Judge Aminuddin Khan and included Judge Jamal Mandokhel, Judge Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Judge Hassan Azhar Rizvi, Judge Musarrat Hilali, Judge Naeem Akhtar Afghan and Judge Shahid Bilal. Attorney Khawaja Haris presented his arguments, explained the army -related process, and how the accusations are framed by the police and federal investigative agency (FIA). Haris explained that the commanding officer had conducted an investigation after the accusation was framed when he responds to the risk of risk. Judge Hilali asked for the investigation and registration procedure for the first information report (company) after the fees. Haris replied to her notes and said the word “accusation” represents accusations against any suspect, and these accusations are the basis of the investigation. Judge Mandokhail noted that the suspect cannot be tested under the Army Act until the accusation is framed. “Framing charges are required,” he added. Judge Hilali then asked if the accusation could be framed during the court proceedings. For this purpose, Haris replied that accusations as in accusations against the suspect are another thing, while further framing the accusation or accusation during the court proceedings is another. The discussion then moved to a military court judge and asked the judge whether the lawyers of the military court wore uniforms. Haris answered a question followed by another of the impartiality of a “united officer”. Let alone Haris replied by the fact that even the judges in this court wore a “uniform” to which the laughter was responsible in court. “You want to suggest that there is no difference between Black and Khaki,” Judge Hilali thought. “The law applies equally to citizens, no matter how strict it is right?” Mandokhail asked. Meanwhile, Mazhar justice asked, “Is the law you refer to, always enforced, as you say?” Haris replied and said that the court’s decision usually takes most of the votes. In court, the accused may protest against the judge. ” This brought a note from justice Hilali that the questions were raised about judges and civil courts these days.
