The chairman of Pakistan’s Islamic Ideology Council, Allama Raghib Naeemi, clarified the council’s recent ruling on digital non-public networks (VPNs), asserting them un-Islamic because of their frequent misuse. Speaking on a private TV morning show, Naeemi said that using registered VPNs for lawful purposes is permissible however raised worries over unregistered use for having access to immoral content. Citing facts from the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA), Naeemi highlighted that ‘nearly 15 million attempts to get right of entry to pornographic websites are made every day in Pakistan through VPN.’ He compared the difficulty to the misuse of loudspeakers, noting that unauthorised movements main to immoral or dangerous behaviour have to be curbed below Sharia law. The fatwa has drawn grievance from the public and religious students alike. Prominent cleric Maulana Tariq Jameel questioned the logic, suggesting that via this cause, mobile telephones can also be deemed greater dangerous. Jamaat-e-Islami chief Hafiz Naeem ur Rehman urged the council to study its choice, warning that such rulings risk undermining the group’s credibility. Naeemi defended the fatwa, declaring that the authorities has a spiritual responsibility to prevent access to unlawful and unethical cloth. He emphasized that VPNs used to bypass prison regulations on dangerous content material violate societal values and Sharia ideas. The debate comes amidst reviews from PTA ranking Pakistan many of the top nations for tried get admission to to explicit on-line fabric, with over 20 million such tries each day. Maulana Tariq Jamil condemns VPN fatwa Renowned Islamic pupil Maulana Tariq Jamil has raised concerns over Council of Islamic Ideology (CII) decree, which declared Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) as un-Islamic (haram). Speaking to a private channel on Sunday, the pupil puzzled the cause at the back of the choice, affirming that if VPNs are considered “haram,” then cellular phones must also fall below the identical category, as they can be used to access similar limited content material. Warning in opposition to the wider implications, he criticised the fatwa as a “slender-minded stance”. He in addition mentioned that mobile phones posed a ways more serious demanding situations because of their potential to get entry to harmful or beside the point cloth, which can be greater negative than VPN usage. The pupil additionally noted his lack of understanding regarding the precise spiritual council liable for the fatwa but reiterated his disagreement with the decision. The debate emerged following the CII’s statement, which deemed VPNs illegal, mentioning worries about their misuse to pass internet censorship and access prohibited fabric.
